I think Eliza Orlins has a good point: This corrupt DOJ is trying to change history. We think of history as being static and accurate, but this DOJ is reaching back into history and changing facts. It's dangerous. It's corrupt. How do we push back? We all have to be truth-tellers. We have to uncover the lies and tell the truth. Thank you, Eliza, for telling the truth.
Thank you for this. You’re exactly right—this is about truth, accountability, and the way institutions try to rewrite the record when they think no one’s paying attention. Surveillance footage isn’t just data. It’s evidence. And when the people in power start quietly altering that evidence, we’re not just watching corruption—we’re watching a cover-up in real time.
We have to speak up. We have to push back. Because if we don’t, they’ll keep doing it—and they’ll get better at hiding it.
Atty Orlins- to further push my question re this blatant manipulation of evidence: how can this bald-faced illegality - inarguably proven - be gotten some serious traction in some serious media venues, equivalent to its importance? Epstein, his life AND his death is the nexus of some of the biggest required accountability as yet not brought.
For those reading this: Think about it for a sec. They knew that this would be discovered. Specifically saying it was "raw" footage is like shining blinking light. But here's the thing. People watching misinformation news outlets like Fox news media will never know it's not authentic. These people only watch fox and fox repeatedly tell their cult viwers that all other media is fake or lie. This release was done this way for one audiance. They don't care what happens elsewhere. Again, I knew... I'm beating the drum of fox spew media. The reason I do is becuase god dang it people, it's the roots of this entire cluster fuck. It's what is holding all the bullshit together. The corrupt DOJ doesn't care what repritable news media's report because their base will never see it or if they do hear about it, it'll be fake news. I wish a mass majority of people would realize the influance fox corporation has on all of this crazy corruption in our government.
Thanks for informing us Eliza. Your dear Lady are the nat in corrupted government behinds. Love you sweetheart.
Slight correction: They thought their Fox News audience, MAGA’s entire base, wouldn’t notice. Importantly, their only audience. They not only aren’t speaking to anyone else, they don’t care, because they’ll just gaslight their audience over the response from everyone else.
First thing first, they clearly haven't cared in the past what should change now? Um, yes woefully incompetent most likely put together by a second grader-wait that's anyone in the administration presently. Metadata has consequences.
PS from one MOT to another nice Mogen David....use it for good 😉
The Video is not admissible due to the lack of proof of chain of custody which infers the video was or could have been tampered with thereby making the evidence inherently unreliable and therefore inadmissible.
I think Eliza Orlins has a good point: This corrupt DOJ is trying to change history. We think of history as being static and accurate, but this DOJ is reaching back into history and changing facts. It's dangerous. It's corrupt. How do we push back? We all have to be truth-tellers. We have to uncover the lies and tell the truth. Thank you, Eliza, for telling the truth.
Thank you for this. You’re exactly right—this is about truth, accountability, and the way institutions try to rewrite the record when they think no one’s paying attention. Surveillance footage isn’t just data. It’s evidence. And when the people in power start quietly altering that evidence, we’re not just watching corruption—we’re watching a cover-up in real time.
We have to speak up. We have to push back. Because if we don’t, they’ll keep doing it—and they’ll get better at hiding it.
Atty Orlins- to further push my question re this blatant manipulation of evidence: how can this bald-faced illegality - inarguably proven - be gotten some serious traction in some serious media venues, equivalent to its importance? Epstein, his life AND his death is the nexus of some of the biggest required accountability as yet not brought.
The DOJ is fraudulent just like the rest of the corrupt administration
For those reading this: Think about it for a sec. They knew that this would be discovered. Specifically saying it was "raw" footage is like shining blinking light. But here's the thing. People watching misinformation news outlets like Fox news media will never know it's not authentic. These people only watch fox and fox repeatedly tell their cult viwers that all other media is fake or lie. This release was done this way for one audiance. They don't care what happens elsewhere. Again, I knew... I'm beating the drum of fox spew media. The reason I do is becuase god dang it people, it's the roots of this entire cluster fuck. It's what is holding all the bullshit together. The corrupt DOJ doesn't care what repritable news media's report because their base will never see it or if they do hear about it, it'll be fake news. I wish a mass majority of people would realize the influance fox corporation has on all of this crazy corruption in our government.
Thanks for informing us Eliza. Your dear Lady are the nat in corrupted government behinds. Love you sweetheart.
What's the next move from we the people here? Thank you greatly for some truth, clarity.
Slight correction: They thought their Fox News audience, MAGA’s entire base, wouldn’t notice. Importantly, their only audience. They not only aren’t speaking to anyone else, they don’t care, because they’ll just gaslight their audience over the response from everyone else.
The Day Jeffrey Epstein Told Me He Had Dirt on Powerful People - The New York Times https://share.google/8U5UL1FVI6MffedcQ
Jeffrey Epstein had tapes of Donald Trump, Ghislaine Maxwell reportedly told reporter | The Independent https://share.google/LOWT9Mpqhk9YLVbYY
First thing first, they clearly haven't cared in the past what should change now? Um, yes woefully incompetent most likely put together by a second grader-wait that's anyone in the administration presently. Metadata has consequences.
PS from one MOT to another nice Mogen David....use it for good 😉
RULES Of EViDENCE:
The Video is not admissible due to the lack of proof of chain of custody which infers the video was or could have been tampered with thereby making the evidence inherently unreliable and therefore inadmissible.
First year law school subject